core
core copied to clipboard
Refactor Tado to use OAuth in the DeviceTracker
Breaking change
Proposed change
As hinted out in Issue 102402, by a developer of Tado, the DeviceTracker is still using the old way of authenticating with Tado. This PR fixes this by utilizing PyTado's methods, which have OAuth. This is in line with the desire of Tado and a foundational improvement, whereas direct protocol specific code has been removed and replaced by PyTado.
Type of change
- [ ] Dependency upgrade
- [ ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New integration (thank you!)
- [ ] New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
- [x] Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
- [x] Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests
Additional information
- This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #102402
- This PR is related to issue:
- Link to documentation pull request:
Checklist
- [x] The code change is tested and works locally.
- [x] Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
- [x] There is no commented out code in this PR.
- [x] I have followed the development checklist
- [x] I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
- [x] The code has been formatted using Black (
black --fast homeassistant tests
) - [x] Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.
If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
- [ ] Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
- [ ] The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
Updated and included derived files by running:python3 -m script.hassfest
. - [ ] New or updated dependencies have been added to
requirements_all.txt
.
Updated by runningpython3 -m script.gen_requirements_all
. - [ ] For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
- [ ] Untested files have been added to
.coveragerc
.
To help with the load of incoming pull requests:
- [ ] I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.
Hey there @michaelarnauts, @chiefdragon, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (tado
) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
Code owner commands
Code owners of tado
can trigger bot actions by commenting:
-
@home-assistant close
Closes the pull request. -
@home-assistant rename Awesome new title
Renames the pull request. -
@home-assistant reopen
Reopen the pull request. -
@home-assistant unassign tado
Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks :+1:
@MartinHjelmare The dispatcher logic has been added and parts refactored to support this. I got a perfectly working setup that updates my device state. Please let me know if you have any feedback.
The config flow and repair issues need to have written tests.
The config flow and repair issues need to have written tests.
Will do so, once the import step is stable enough to write tests. 👍
I think you can start writing tests for the config flow now.
Just solve the merge conflict and we can merge, I think.
Please add a paragraph in the PR description about what is deprecated now.
We should update the docs about the device tracker too.
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/tado/#presence-detection
Please link a docs PR here.
We should update the docs about the device tracker too.
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/tado/#presence-detection
Please link a docs PR here.
PR made and submitted.
That return value now gives trouble in the CI. Shall I fix it?