why not use a 386 alpine with high version

[introspection3]

why not use a 386 alpine with high version

[holzschu]

I might need you to give more explanations here. I assume you mean "as a replacement for WebAssembly interpretation that is used for some commands". But then I don't understand what "with high version" means in that context. The short answer is that making a 386 alpine interpreter is a lot of work. We do have a x86 interpreter in recent versions (blink) but an interpreter itself is only the first half, you need to port the entire system as well, and integrating with iOS system functions is very complicated.

[introspection3]

Sir, I think you can develop a special browser to force Apple (browsers are protected by antitrust laws) to open the JIT function to you. This browser can run the virtual machine function. at same time ,you can use webassembly sockets function.

[jroseff]

I might need you to give more explanations here. I assume you mean "as a replacement for WebAssembly interpretation that is used for some commands". But then I don't understand what "with high version" means in that context. The short answer is that making a 386 alpine interpreter is a lot of work. We do have a x86 interpreter in recent versions (blink) but an interpreter itself is only the first half, you need to port the entire system as well, and integrating with iOS system functions is very complicated.

I think introspection3 is referring to iSH, which could be described as "[i]386 alpine", it's literally an x86 interpreter coupled with a barebones install of Alpine Linux.