Holger Drewes

> Well, if we start throwing on `put` as well, then this is breaking, right? Technically rather yes, though one could also put this in the bugfix-category (if my understanding...

> Also if we are not concerned with "running" a multi-team testnet atleast before going live, we can just make do with a `genesis.json` (setting off with a deployed deposit...

> Can we close this now that we have the meta issue #2375 and the PR branch? No strong opinion, yeah, but why not. Everyone feel free to reopen though...

@thevaizman @acolytec3 have you guys tried differenet typescript versions respectively what are your respective versions? Maybe it is really some compiler bug? 🤔

> @holgerd77 @acolytec3 Mine is `typescript 4.4.4`. I can see that your project has `4.7.4`. It doesn't seem to make much difference as I upgraded mine to `4.7.4` using `yarn...

The [AsyncEventEmitter](https://github.com/ahultgren/async-eventemitter) library is MIT licenced, I guess we can just internalize and modify the code base on our side? WDYGT? 🤔 (also has some side-security-benefits)

(eventually we even add to the Util package, so that we can reuse in both VM and EVM)

👍

> So this essentially means that we can now create the proof to feed in `verifyRangeProof`, right? Very exciting. The above comment is hard to read, this here is an...

Just to note: CI tests are partly failing for this PR.