holfordm

The idea of listing each part separately looks like it could be a good temporary solution. I don't know enough about SOLR / Blacklight, but would we really have to...

Looking at how other institutions have dealt with this. Biblissima index entry for a Pseudo-Cicero text has some entries for "manuscripts" and some for "parts of manuscripts". http://beta.biblissima.fr/fr/ark:/43093/oedata6faf100c5a7ac93a73a7cd50662ef5e358ba368f

Yes. The explanation is that not all the records with provenance info. included info. about when Bodleian acquired the MSS.; so, everything had to go in ``. These records should...

Most examples are of type 1, which also looks better when displayed (I think), so I say we go with that.

The aim (I think) would be to improve the interoperability / machine readability of the data by either making it clear that our dates (attributes and text) are Julian unless...

Thanks - will do. It may better to reorganize the entries using msPart instead of accMat - I'll let you know.

This is particularly difficult since the content of the addition is post medieval; if it were a medieval addition I would treat it as a `msItem`. The `additions` element doesn't...

would it be helpful if I came to Osney at some point this week (tomorrow am or Weds am or Thurs am) to try and get the display as good...

still live: - refine rules for inserting ';' before or after origPlace [see e.g. http:/medieval-qa.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/catalog/manuscript_1591 part 4]; problems with multiple origPlace generating multiple ';;' only first or last should generate...

I am happy to leave the display as it is (i.e. with provenance and acquisition together). Since the new information will include `@key` and `@role` for persons and organizations, the...