hoijui

## a +1 with my own reasoning for me, one of the essential qualities of git, is that one is able to fetch from any repo, then look at it...

### Side Note The `gist` ontology (_a minimalist upper ontology created by Semantic Arts_) apparently also has the two, and they already refer to the schema.org version in a comment:...

> I didn't know DC had copied the name. It looks like they have subtly different meanings. /cc @tombaker This is the closest I could find for a possible, public...

Over in the [DC pendent of this issue](https://github.com/dcmi/usage/issues/43#issuecomment-1890376523), the idea was mentioned that it might make sense - in direct response to @kcoyle s explanation - to mark the `schema.org`...

There is an other duplicate of these two properties at DCID (DataCommons): - [`dcid:domainIncludes`](https://datacommons.org/browser/domainIncludes) - [`dcid:rangeIncludes`](https://datacommons.org/browser/rangeIncludes) Though they do not provide a description/definition, as it seems.

In an other issue, @jlovejoy linked me to this: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/other-licensing-information-detected/ For me, that does not help in getting me there, though. what does "locally unique" mean, for example. is the...

thank you @jdm ! :-) I am working on some code that checks links in documents, and tells the user which ones are valid and which not (anymore). For this,...

hey @RXminuS :-) ... you resorted to ? why is it not optimal?

hey @hupfdule ! It looks to me like the original repo/maintainer is not reliable (anymore), and you seem to be the most active person in this project. Would you be...

cool! :-) What would have to be done... * It would have to be open source first, meaning: * all the source files would have to be there (I think...