Julian Jandl

@edbzn this def. changes our minimum rxjs requirement. `connectable` is not present in `6.5.3` 

hey @edbzn, can we go a step further and let users replace the whole accumulation observable? I would LOVE to get rid of the `queueScheduler` in some projects, e.g. We...

@edbzn we should also adjust docs for this

>Thanks for the review @hoebbelsB. I think having a token for the whole observable would only complicate the definition of a custom accumulator and I don't think about a scenario...

i really like the idea, we also need this overload for `rxLet` ^^

I think @BioPhoton worked on something that goes in this direction: https://github.com/rx-angular/rx-angular/pull/1192

@LayZeeDK please unassign if you don't like :D I thought you have the greatest knowledge about the docusaurus setup

hey @volser thanks for the issue, i'm looking into it!

hello @volser we've published a new version which also ships the new `appendOnly` mode. Could you please see if this solves your issue?

@volser did it solve your issue or is there further investigation needed?