Howard Mansell

In the first instance, we could output "evaluation deferred - call Materialize() to see data", so the message isn't so perplexing. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Tomas...

I've thought the same things and wanted to define a ? operator. Problem is that if we define it as a standalone operator, I believe (not 100% sure) that it...

I can't point to any in any external code, but in some internal code we have the following (this is from a legacy C# DataFrame implementation): ``` public static Series...

I don't think factors are being converted to zeros, they are representing strings as integers (kind of like an enum). They just all happened to be the same. In the...

If we are going to have funny type-specific function names, then we their name should reflect the type. indexRowsDateTime indexRowsDateTimeOffset etc.

I'm a little bit unclear what you are trying to achieve here. But I think in general we don't have good handling for NA in the RProvider. Seems like NaNs...

Seems like a dup of #63.

In case it is not obvious, it is not the same as the Haskell $ operator. It applies a function to a series, which is an extremely common operation. Having...

So $ is valid but $> is not? On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Don Syme [email protected] wrote: > No, it's not possible to use $>. > >...

I think it would be better to serialize the actual values from the R engine. Otherwise you don’t have robust round-tripping. I am pretty sure R has good support for...