Howard M. Lewis Ship

That was my intent. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:35 AM Daniel Compton wrote: > Would we determine semantic incompatibility by trying to treat the > versions as semantic...

It's been a busy couple of months since I've checked up on this. I'd be glad to accept a reasonable PR; it should be possible to merge in some styling...

Could go from current Rook stuff, with minor changes, to the Pedestal table or terse format. Terse might be better, as that's already hierarchical. Route names could be keyword-ized qualified...

In more recent builds, most of the dev-only stuff went away, but still have the .DS_Store files.

Sorry for the delay in responding; noise vs. signal and all. I've been doing quite a bit of work resolving the dependencies and excluding as many as possible, I'll take...

What version of Rook, and what else is in your project.clj?

In the apps we're building with Rook, authentication is in two parts: - metadata on the individual endpoints to describe the required authorization (e.g., role or permission required) - middleware...

Sorry, no progress on this lately, but I'll probably do a lot of documentation updates after the Swagger support (part of 0.1.27) is working acceptably.

Not all of this will go into "What is an Interceptor?" which is more of a beginner's introduction, but I've verified that all the bullet-items in the list are present...

Thank you for contributing to Pedestal! Sorry it's taken us such a long time to get around to addressing your Pull Request. We'd like to review and integrate your contribution...