Joerg Henrichs

> I've just refactored what I have in #2413 to remove this duplication. If you have a look at my latest changes you'll see I've altered ModuleInfo to take an...

I totally agree that this would be useful. I vaguely remember seeing that some objects still had a reader object stored?? A quick look shows that the match functions in...

While we all agree that PSyclone should abort when it is trying to write a private variable to a file which it can't access (so the modified psy-layer will not...

Yes, will do, and sorry, I forgot to reset the state to 'in progress' after the telco. Similarly there is the introduction of the routine_info, which I hope to get...

I got an email saying that one line is missed by coverage, but the link then shows full coverage (and the codecov isn't updated here). So I am confused, and...

I've also triggered the CI earlier. Ready for next review.

My apologies for first discussing the need to remove private/protected - given the progress I've made with FAB, I've decided to just not include this anymore, so I hope a...

VERY rough brainstorming only - just some key ideas, many of the ideas need some thorough fleshing out (and maybe the idea is even stupid in the first place :)...

I am actually thinking of running the apps at the same time, and communicate the results at runtime (either using MPI dynamic process functionality (might not be supported on some...

Ah yes, good point, that would work of course. Though direct communication means after a change is detected, we can send the 'correct' result to be used on the 'incorrect'...