GML 3.2.2 mappings

[samuel-girard]

Hi @highsource

I have been trying to generate GML 3.2.2 mappings using jsonix-schema-compiler, but I faced multiple errors, similar to what I read in https://github.com/highsource/jsonix/issues/22

Is there an easy way to generate this version, as you did for the previous 3.2.1 version?
From what I read in the issue, it seems that you did some manual work in order to do it. Anything that we can reproduce?

Thanks.

[highsource]

I'll take a look. Normally OGC schemas need some cutomization, but you always have too look at details.

Do you happen to have some sample XML files you could contribute for testing?

[samuel-girard]

Thanks for your quick answer.
I'll check if I can have some samples I can share (we need it in a WPS 2 context).
One information that might be useful: the version 3.2.2 is actually located in http://schemas.opengis.net/gml/3.2.1/ (they overwrote 3.2.1 with 3.2.2 as it is just a "corrigendum" of 3.2.1)

[samuel-girard]

Here is an example of WPS request including a GML part that should pass with 3.2.2 but does not in 3.2.1:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wps:Execute xmlns:wps="http://www.opengis.net/wps/2.0"
			 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
			 xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0"
			 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
			 service="WPS" version="2.0.0" response="document" mode="sync">
	<wps:Input id="polygone">
		<wps:Data mimeType="text/xml">
			<LinearRing srsName="EPSG:4326" xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/gml/3.2">
				<coordinates>-0.631235,46.307557 -0.262215,46.577225 0.106805,46.477874 -0.631235,46.307557</coordinates>
			</LinearRing>
		</wps:Data>
	</wps:Input>
</wps:Execute>

[highsource]

GML 3.2.2 imports ISO 19139 which imports GML 3.2.1. Which uses the same namespaces as GML 3.2.2.

Which effectively gives a lot of conflicts.

I'm not sure how to solve this.

[highsource]

@samuel-girard I have updated GML 3.2.1 schemas. So actually GML 3.2.1 is GML 3.2.2 now. Could you please check out/build and give it a try?

I consider renaming 3.2.1 simply to 3.2. I think it is better to have 3.2 to represent 3.2.2 vs. 3.2.1 to represent 3.2.2.

[highsource]

After some consideration, I will go forward and rename GML 3.2.1 artifacts to GML 3.2. This includes:

• Maven module: gml-v_3_2_1 -> gml-v_3_2.
• Java package: net.opengis.gml.v_3_2_1 -> net.opengis.gml.v_3_2.
• JS module: GML_3_2_1.js -> GML_3_2.js.
• JSON Schema: GML_3_2_1.jsonschema -> GML_3_2.jsonschema.

This will be a breaking change so I'll have to bump version to 3.0.0.

[highsource]

@samuel-girard Please give the current snapshot a try.

[samuel-girard]

Hi @highsource

I am not working on this part anymore, but I will let know the people in charge so they can get back to you.
Thanks for your work!