Alexey Valikov

> Great to hear. ogc-schemas is the place to start then In general, yes. However I could implement a GML-only project as well. ogc-schemas contains way too much. > Ok...

Hi @cyrilchapon. You see, I'm a bit in a limbo here at the moment. I have to stay home due to a chemo treatment and I'm a bit bored. Answering...

@cyrilchapon By the way, have you seen this project: https://github.com/derhuerst/parse-gml-polygon

BTW do you need it bidirectional? I.e. GML to GeoJSON as well as GeoJSON to GML? Extracting GML parser from OpenLayers is an option, but it's not really a very...

Cool that @derhuerst joined us here. Yes I think we were talking about something like `wfs-gml-to-geojson`. I think a robust and well-written library of this kind would be very useful....

@derhuerst I'd like to give it a try with simpler geometries first - like point or line string. Should I fork/send PRs for `parse-gml-polygon`? Or do you want to create...

@cyrilchapon @derhuerst I would like to suggest to stick with what `parse-gml-polygon` uses at the moment as it apparently works. We can engage in a "best way to parse XML...

@derhuerst Great, I'll start today or tomorrow.

What we quite urgently need is a lot of GML samples.

@cyrilchapon This [gml-to-geojson](https://github.com/permettez-moi-de-construire/gml-to-geojson) is your project, isn't it? I personally would invest in `wfs-gml-to-geojson`. I have capabilities and would like to collaborate on a reasonable non-Java project.