New fork of ccflare
Hi,
I see that you listed ccflare. It's not been maintained or updated for a while now so I forked it and added a bunch of additional providers as well as general compatibility with Anthropic and OpenAI providers, security improvements etc.
I'd be happy if you would have a look and include it! https://github.com/tombii/better-ccflare/
@tombii hm that's interesting, thanks for letting me know! i'll see if i can find out what's up with snipeship, but otherwise yeah i'd be happy to update it if you're committed to maintaining it. have you tried reaching out to snipeship? thanks
I created a PR but no response. There's a bunch of PRs and issues that have not been addressed and it's been a few months now. I'm committed to maintaining it, check the commit log to see all the work I've put into it :)
thanks @tombii i'll see if i hear anything from snipeship, but maybe you could clarify a bit what kinds of enhancements / fixes you've added? cheers.
Here are a few enhancements since I forked it:
- Fixed proper usage tracking (the original version requires the user to input the subscription tier and then makes some rough estimates about the usage, better-ccflare fetches the usage from the Anthropic API and displays it in real time)
- Added more inference providers, such as z.ai, Minimax, NanoGPT including fetching of subscription usage
- Added generic configuration for any Anthropic and OpenAI compatible providers
- Performance enhancements such as rewriting recursive loops, better DB indexing, refactoring of DB operations
- Real time monitoring of OAuth token health and proactive refresh
- Auto-refresh of Claude Pro/Max usage windows
- Support for https
- Docker images, binaries and npmjs.com so that users don't have to build from source
@tombii ok thanks for the info - i'm not sure what is best practice in this kind of situation - if snipeship responded today like "ok i was really busy i'm going to fix the backlog", etc., would you want to collaborate with him or would you still want to continue your own fork regardless? ccflare is still pretty popular afaik (stars kinda "plateaued" but w/e), so i just want to make sure that the upstream is really abandoned and do due dilligence before I say "this is now ccflare fork" ya know? anyway i'm gonna wait a few days to see if snipeship responds. idk if you tried making an Issue in ccflare like "Is this repo maintained"(?) but I can see that your fork is the only one with non-zero stars that has been updated in months
@tombii approved