hesreallyhim
[Resource]: Claude CodePro
Display Name
Claude CodePro
Category
Workflows & Knowledge Guides
Sub-Category
General
Primary Link
https://github.com/maxritter/claude-codepro
Secondary Link
https://www.claude-code.pro
Author Name
Max Ritter
Author Link
https://www.maxritter.net
License
MIT
Other License
No response
Description
A professional system for building production-grade code using spec-driven development, semantic search, cross-session memory, test-driven-development, skills, context management, quality-ensurance hooks, rules builder, and much more.
Additional Comments
No response
Submission Checklist
- [x] I have checked that this resource hasn't already been submitted
- [x] My resource provides genuine value to Claude Code users, and any risks are clearly stated
- [x] All provided links are working and publicly accessible
- [x] I am submitting only ONE resource in this issue
- [x] I understand that low-quality or duplicate submissions may be rejected
@hesreallyhim Claude CodePro has now reached version 2.0.0 with great improvements from my daily work and experience as a professional software engineer. I use it daily for my client projects with great success and it gives me much faster and more token-optimized results than any other framework I have tested so far (OpenSpec, SpecKit, AgentOS).
Would be great if you can consider this project for your weekly updates, thanks so much!
@maxritter nice work this looks great, I'm gonna add it but the description is not the right tone, and I'm not sure how best to rewrite it so see if you can take another pass at it, otherwise I'll do my best - the guidelines are use descriptive language (no emojis plz), and stuff like "Stop vibe coding, start shipping systematically" is a little too "marketing-y" style than what fits here, otherwise yeah really nice work. /request-changes description
🔄 Changes Requested by @hesreallyhim
description
Please edit your issue to address these points. The validation will run again automatically after you make changes.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
📝 Issue Updated
@hesreallyhim - The submitter has edited their issue in response to your requested changes.
✅ The updated submission now passes all validation checks!
You may want to review the changes and consider approving the submission.
@hesreallyhim Thanks a lot for your kind feedback, really appreciate it! I have done my best to rewrite the description to better match the style of the other projects, I hope it is a better fit now :)
@maxritter can you condense the last two sentences? I think there's still a little redundancy. Pick out the stuff you really want to highlight, I think it makes people more interested actually than if they have to read three sentences, which is a lot for people these days. 🤣
Sorry I'm not trying to nit-picky, I just wanted to clarify, hopefully it's helpful (sorry if it isn't), I'll just give you an example:
Features modular rules system with auto-generated slash commands and skills, integrated MCP servers for cross-session memory and semantic code search, automated testing and quality tools via hooks, and pre-configured dev container. Includes /plan, /implement, /verify, /remember and /quick commands with automatic context management and token optimization.
To me it seems like there's some overlap here. I don't know if I'm expressing myself clearly, but like everybody has a framework that they say does everything and more, so it starts to become more noise than signal - whereas if you focus on like what are the "core" things that are appealing, IMO that's a better way to draw people's attention - like, to me, "pre-configured dev container" is a big deal lol even if maybe you don't think it's an important feature. Just speaking as someone who's read a lot of these kinds of descriptions. Anyway, maybe give it one more pass, I'm not trying to be critical, just kind of sharing my opinion. 👍
@hesreallyhim Would be great if you do not forget about Claude CodePro - it has received some great updates over the last week such as a one-line installer and is now fully tuned towards usage with Opus 4.5 ;)
hi @maxritter i'm working on a way to streamline checking out powerful frameworks like this, but since you said:
use it daily for my client projects with great success and it gives me much faster and more token-optimized results than any other framework I have tested so far
ok this sounds very cool - could you give me a straightforward example of something like: a task/context for Claude to work on and what prompt I should give to Claude Code? or; a pre-made repo or anything that I can set up, run this, what prompt should I give it, and I can immediately see the results. Maybe this is an over-simplification for some workflows or plugins, etc., but I'm going to be relying more on data or reproducible results, and it sounds like this should be able to show me pretty quickly the benefits, right? so that would be a huge help. Also i want to make sure that the resources that are currently available will be available going forward with the launch of the paid or "pro" version of the website, and so on. (It's fine if that's not the case, i just want to know one way or the other.) thanks!
/request-changes see comment
🔄 Changes Requested by @hesreallyhim
see comment
Please edit your issue to address these points. The validation will run again automatically after you make changes.
hi @maxritter i'm working on a way to streamline checking out powerful frameworks like this, but since you said:
use it daily for my client projects with great success and it gives me much faster and more token-optimized results than any other framework I have tested so far
ok this sounds very cool - could you give me a straightforward example of something like: a task/context for Claude to work on and what prompt I should give to Claude Code? or; a pre-made repo or anything that I can set up, run this, what prompt should I give it, and I can immediately see the results. Maybe this is an over-simplification for some workflows or plugins, etc., but I'm going to be relying more on data or reproducible results, and it sounds like this should be able to show me pretty quickly the benefits, right? so that would be a huge help. Also i want to make sure that the resources that are currently available will be available going forward with the launch of the paid or "pro" version of the website, and so on. (It's fine if that's not the case, i just want to know one way or the other.) thanks!
/request-changes see comment
@hesreallyhim Sure, here is an example project that you can quickly setup to see how Claude CodePro works in action. We are using https://tanstack.com/start/latest to build a Full-Stack project, run the following in your repos/projects folder: pnpm create @tanstack/start@latest. In the interactive setup prompts:
Project name: foodstarter
Use Tailwind CSS
Use ESLint
Use Netlify
Enable Drizzle for ORM
Use SQLite
Then cd into this created starter project and install Claude CodePro Dev Container into it by following the Readme install instructions. Finally, when you are in your favorite terminal and everything is properly setup, use the /plan command with the following prompt to create the spec, then follow the spec-driven process to finish building the project:
Build a food tracking app. This app allows users to track their food.
It uses drizzle ORM to interact with the SQLite database and should be available under /food route.
This app is built with TanStack Start, will be using pnpm commands such as install.
The features / API routes should be: Add food, view food, edit food, delete food, list food.
The app should have a nice dark mode design and look very modern and clean.
When CC has finished its work with /implement, you can run /review to make sure everything works. Then you can see the app yourself by running the pnpm dev --host command and accessing the network url with `/food' suffix.
The framework is licensed under MIT and therefore is and will be completely free for anyone to use.
📝 Issue Updated
@hesreallyhim - The submitter has edited their issue in response to your requested changes.
✅ The updated submission now passes all validation checks!
You may want to review the changes and consider approving the submission.
@hesreallyhim Claude Code has added native support for modular rules yesterday (https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory#modular-rules-with-claude/rules/) and the CCP framework now supports this natively in version 3.1. I think this is an important feature and similar to what Kiro has provided with steering files for some time already. Would be great if you can consider adding CCP to your list again
🤖 Validation Results
✅ All validation checks passed!
Your submission is ready for review by a maintainer.
Validated Data:
{
"display_name": "Claude CodePro",
"category": "Workflows & Knowledge Guides",
"subcategory": "General",
"primary_link": "https://github.com/maxritter/claude-codepro",
"secondary_link": "",
"author_name": "Max Ritter",
"author_link": "https://www.maxritter.net",
"license": "MIT",
"description": "Professional development environment for Claude Code with spec-driven workflow, TDD enforcement, cross-session memory, semantic search, quality hooks, and modular rules integration. A bit \"heavyweight\" but feature-packed and has wide coverage.",
"active": "TRUE",
"last_checked": "2025-12-18:06-15-12"
}
This comment is automatically updated when you edit the issue.
✅ Resource Approved!
❌ There was an error creating the pull request.
Please check the workflow logs for details.