Henri Devigne

Found, I have to define a threeshold .... Why this is required ? It should be smart and automatically move someting when the cpu is too much used.

I had to define a very threeshold of 50% but i shouldn't have to do that, it should be live automatically calculated no ?

The objective is to live migration to have a perfect balance between host, not a load balancing only when the hyper-visor is ready to die with a high threeshold ,...

Because currently: i did ``` performance mode: threesholds: CPU 50% ``` BUT IF ``` HOST1: 35% HOST2: 0% ``` Nothing happen. It's not normal Third Example ``` Host1: 90% Host2:...

Can you please give more detail on the ducmentation about this please ? Best regards

Hello, Thank you very much for your explanation ! VMWare DRS doesn't ask for a "threeshold" we only choose a "middle point" between agressive and passage  And vm are...

In opposite, can you maybe purpose the reversed density method ? To use all hyper-visor if possible ? This should answer to my problem maybe :-)

hello, Okay thank you. What do you think about my feature proposal ? The opposite of density mode ? With this, i could imagine: Host1: - VM1 - VM2 -...

Hello, Hmmm, this is very clear, but what you described look like the reverse of the density mode, Define this in performance can be disturbing, i think it should have...

Hello, I like the name "prepositionning", so, will it be a dedicated mode ? not juste a "performance" sub-mode ? Best regards :-)