Heitor Lessa

And yes, I also agree that defining a local `or {}` is better in the current case since we are explicit with our return type being `Optional`. The only added...

Thanks a lot for creating and giving more context @alexandreczg - I'll look into it first thing tomorrow morning (Amsterdam time).

Going through this now (operational task took priority) - I removed the `bug` label for now as I'm leaning towards defensive programming from self-inflicted errors here. I see two ways...

Hi @whardier thanks for creating a RFC, much appreciated! We do this today in the Parameters utility - by default we cache any parameter(s) for 5s: https://awslabs.github.io/aws-lambda-powertools-python/latest/utilities/parameters/#adjusting-cache-ttl This ensures we...

Awesome, B it is (my preference also). Send an email to aws-lambda-powertools-feedback at amazon dot com, and any of us will reply with a link that you schedule a slot...

Understood - that's helpful, thank you! My initial concern was supporting Extensions as part of the project as it's not trivial to debug and maintain yet. I'll come back to...

Added labels to express we'd like to hear customer feedback before considering it. We had the same discussion on other Powertools and we didn't get much traction from other customers...

Hey @Rogalek - could you share the code you've used for this simple test and what memory size you've used? Did you use two different functions and two different APIs?...

rescheduling this for mid next week. Depending on how p99 turns out, we **might** add temporary support for AppConfig Extensions. I say **temporary**, because this is a band-aid and an...

Happy with any PR to get temporary support for AppConfig Extensions - [as expected it's AWS SDK during cold start](https://www.tecracer.com/blog/2021/02/how-boto3-impacts-the-cold-start-times-of-your-lambda-functions.html) (gunzip service model + runtime code generation + sigv4 +...