clonevol
clonevol copied to clipboard
[Help..] Found 0 consensus model(s)
Hi, Dang, H. X.,
I'm trying to use Clonevol, but I cannot get consensus model when I tried to run "_infer.clonal.model_s". In this example, I have 6 samples (3 primary, 3 metastasis), and I ran Pyclone and VAF was calculated as cellular_prevalence *100/2, as recommended by tutorial. I filtered out clones that had <5 variants, and I used below commend for infer.clonal.models. I reviewed every issues in here, but did not figure out why clonevol did not infer consensus models for this case. I tried tuning every possible options, but I failed.. To be honest, I tried some of other samples (5~8 samples per case), but I did not success to infer consensus clonal model. could you help to figure it out? I attached the data file, code I used, and results of it. Also variant_clone plot is attached.
Thank you,
Young
====code=======
y = infer.clonal.models(variants = clonevol_012,
cluster.col.name = 'cluster',
vaf.col.names = vaf.col.names, ##for CCF, ccf.col.names could be used
sample.groups = NULL,
cancer.initiation.model='monoclonal', ##could select "polyclonal"
subclonal.test = 'bootstrap',
subclonal.test.model = 'non-parametric', ## could be "beta-binomial"non-parametric
num.boots = 1000,
founding.cluster = 1, ## clusters of variants that are found in all samples, drivers/founder clusters
cluster.center = 'mean',
ignore.clusters = NULL,
clone.colors = clone.colors,
##seeding.aware.tree.pruning = TRUE, merge.similar.samples = TRUE,
min.cluster.vaf = 0.01,
score.model.by="prabability",
# min probability that CCF(clone) is non-negative
sum.p = 0.01,
# alpha level in confidence interval estimate for CCF(clone)
alpha=0.01)
======results===
Sample 1: M <-- M
Sample 2: Sm <-- Sm
Sample 3: S <-- S
Sample 4: Ov1 <-- Ov1
Sample 5: Ov2 <-- Ov2
Sample 6: Per <-- Per
Using monoclonal model
Note: all VAFs were divided by 100 to convert from percentage to proportion.
Generating non-parametric boostrap samples...
M : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters:
M : 40 clonal architecture model(s) found
Sm : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters:
Sm : 32 clonal architecture model(s) found
S : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters:
S : 7 clonal architecture model(s) found
Ov1 : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters: 3
Ov1 : 3 clonal architecture model(s) found
Ov2 : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters:
Ov2 : 16 clonal architecture model(s) found
Per : Enumerating clonal architectures...
Determining if cluster VAF is significantly positive...
Exluding clusters whose VAF < min.cluster.vaf=0.01
Non-positive VAF clusters:
Per : 3 clonal architecture model(s) found
Finding consensus models across samples...
Found 0 consensus model(s)
Found 0 consensus model(s)
Scoring models...
Pruning consensus clonal evolution trees....
Seeding aware pruning is: off
Number of unique pruned consensus trees: 0
Hi,
I met the same problem. It seems the author didn't respond to these issues. Do you have any solution?
No. I did not solve it....