Philip Hyunsu Cho

@dependabot rebase

@wbo4958 Is it okay to upgrade to cuDF 24.04 for the JVM packages?

XGBoost 2.0.3 is built with dependencies of gRPC 1.49.1: https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/blob/82d846bbeb83c652a0b1dff0e3519e67569c4a3d/tests/ci_build/Dockerfile.gpu_build_centos7#L52-L59

@soumen-ghosh BoringSSL does not use well-defined versioning. gRPC uses a specific commit hash to refer to different versions of BoringSSL. For example: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36089

@soumen-ghosh You may consider building XGBoost from the source to exclude c-ares and BoringSSL dependencies. See https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/stable/build.html for instructions.

No need to specify anything. Federated plugin will be disabled by default.

Not sure why you are having issue with glibcxx. For the record, we currently use GCC 9.3.1 to build XGBoost.

Context: I made this logo after getting inspiration from [this Twitter thread](https://twitter.com/Aikoyori/status/1780709418189078954)

It is not possible to "downgrade" a trained model. This is analogous to Microsoft Word 97 being unable to load .docx files from Word 2019. Is it possible to upgrade...

> I read in the docs that the model is forwards compatible across versions The docs say that the model is **backwards** compatible, which is in the opposite direction of...