Abstract support?

[kevinresol]

Currently it only match classes / interfaces

But then ClassBuilder doesn't work with TAbstract...

Currently it does match the impl class, but there I think the class meta info is lost.

[back2dos]

Yeah, in principle I wouldn't mind, but there's that ClassBuilder dependency that's kind of hard to deal with. Ideas?

[kevinresol]

Can we just get rid of ClassBuilder and pass the Type directly? And add Types.getClassBuilder(type:Type) for quick creation.

[back2dos]

Probably, yes. I think there was some obscure reason why I went with ClassBuilder in the first place, but I can't remember right now.