haddock
haddock copied to clipboard
haskell
Haskell Documentation Tool
Facebook has a rather intriguing [commit][1] in their Haddock repository which appears to allow parallelization of the Haddock build. It would be worth checking whether this can be folded upstream...
This is a bug that the QuickJump search result link is wrong when there is a module that shares the same namespace. Our project has a `Utils` module, for example,...
When I am reading the generated HTML haddock documentation, I double click on a type because I want to select it. The bug is that it also selects the word...
In [haddock-library,](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/haddock-library) the module [Documentation.Haddock.Parser](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/haddock-library-1.10.0/docs/Documentation-Haddock-Parser.html) exports `parseString` but does not export `parseText`. I think it would make much more sense to export both.
Haddock gets horribly confused by the use of backpack today. A quick list of rough edges I've cut myself on recently. * It seems to have a hard time finding...
identical to https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/1229 fix was implemented in commit https://github.com/haskell/haddock/commit/bc962c945af2955402c8bed66ccb310f35a1e676 but that was never merged to the version of haddock installed by `cabal install haddock`
With GHC 8.2+ you can construct a record pattern synonym and export it as a bound pattern. ```haskell module Quux (Foo(.., Bar, baz)) where data Foo = Foo Int pattern...
I recently put together [a package](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/sockets-and-pipes-0.1) that includes a lot modules re-exported from other packages, and the Cabal description includes links to these modules using haddock's double-quote syntax. I thought...
The test `haddockHtmlTest` fails with Haddock's `ghc-9.0` branch 23ee81fc79. I'm using the tip of GHC's `ghc-9.0` branch - commit c78867a186c21, except the submodule is updated: https://gitlab.haskell.org/tweag/ghc/-/pipelines/31780 I have not investigated...
In the following snippet from [the docs for `Data.Functor.Rep`](http://hackage.haskell.org/package/adjunctions-4.3/docs/Data-Functor-Rep.html#g:1) I wonder why haddock shows only the kind of the associated `Rep` type:  Wouldn't it be better...
