hash icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
hash copied to clipboard

Update Rust crate `oxc` to v0.72.3

Open hash-worker[bot] opened this issue 8 months ago • 4 comments

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
oxc (source) workspace.dependencies minor =0.67.0 -> =0.72.3

[!WARNING] Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

hash-worker[bot] avatar May 04 '25 03:05 hash-worker[bot]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --workspace
info: syncing channel updates for 'nightly-2025-06-02-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
info: latest update on 2025-06-02, rust version 1.89.0-nightly (99e7c15e8 2025-06-01)
info: downloading component 'cargo'
info: downloading component 'clippy'
info: downloading component 'llvm-tools'
info: downloading component 'miri'
info: downloading component 'rust-analyzer'
info: downloading component 'rust-src'
info: downloading component 'rust-std'
info: downloading component 'rustc'
info: downloading component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: downloading component 'rustfmt'
info: installing component 'cargo'
info: installing component 'clippy'
info: installing component 'llvm-tools'
info: installing component 'miri'
info: installing component 'rust-analyzer'
info: installing component 'rust-src'
info: installing component 'rust-std'
info: installing component 'rustc'
info: installing component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: installing component 'rustfmt'
    Updating git repository `https://github.com/TimDiekmann/oxc`
From https://github.com/TimDiekmann/oxc
 * [new ref]             333f583e3f20d40530ca414fbf9c14e49d066fff -> refs/commit/333f583e3f20d40530ca414fbf9c14e49d066fff
    Updating git repository `https://github.com/specta-rs/specta`
From https://github.com/specta-rs/specta
 * [new ref]         ab7d9245d5e2ace951707c3c383b0211ca7fc8ce -> refs/commit/ab7d9245d5e2ace951707c3c383b0211ca7fc8ce
    Updating crates.io index
    Updating git repository `https://github.com/temporalio/sdk-core`
From https://github.com/temporalio/sdk-core
 * [new ref]         4a2368d19f57e971ca9b2465f1dbeede7a861c34 -> refs/commit/4a2368d19f57e971ca9b2465f1dbeede7a861c34
error: failed to select a version for `oxc`.
    ... required by package `hash-codegen v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/codegen)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-codegen` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-codec v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/codec)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-codec` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/apps/hash-graph)`
versions that meet the requirements `=0.72.3` are: 0.72.3

package `hash-codegen` depends on `oxc` with feature `allocator_api` but `oxc` does not have that feature.


failed to select a version for `oxc` which could resolve this conflict

hash-worker[bot] avatar May 04 '25 03:05 hash-worker[bot]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 53.04%. Comparing base (461e66d) to head (6df95ea). Report is 152 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7082      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.98%   53.04%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1078     1078              
  Lines       93534    93431     -103     
  Branches     4408     4392      -16     
==========================================
+ Hits        49557    49559       +2     
+ Misses      43046    42942     -104     
+ Partials      931      930       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
local.harpc-client 50.93% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer 74.75% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 89.07% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.97% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 95.87% <ø> (+0.03%) :arrow_up:
rust.harpc-tower 66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 5.04% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 20.46% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 27.99% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.30% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 85.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 53.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 80.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 79.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif 97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
  • :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codecov[bot] avatar May 15 '25 14:05 codecov[bot]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Jun 11 '25 18:06 hash-worker[bot]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.17 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.62 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$54.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$89.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 682 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.29 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$75.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 652 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 771 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 559 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.46 \mathrm{s} \pm 547 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$21.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}75.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$87.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 852 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.873 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-33.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.211 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

github-actions[bot] avatar Jun 11 '25 18:06 github-actions[bot]

Autoclosing Skipped

This PR has been flagged for autoclosing. However, it is being skipped due to the branch being already modified. Please close/delete it manually or report a bug if you think this is in error.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Jun 30 '25 23:06 hash-worker[bot]