hash icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
hash copied to clipboard

Update `effect` npm packages

Open hash-worker[bot] opened this issue 9 months ago • 2 comments

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
@effect/platform (source) devDependencies minor 0.79.2 -> 0.85.1 0.85.2
@effect/platform-node (source) devDependencies minor 0.75.2 -> 0.86.2 0.86.4 (+1)
effect (source) dependencies minor 3.13.11 -> 3.16.8

[!WARNING] Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform)

v0.85.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v0.84.11

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.83.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v0.82.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • #​4855 618903b Thanks @​gcanti! - Enhance OpenAPI documentation handling by adding safe serialization and HTML escaping functions. This prevents script injection and ensures valid JSON output in the Swagger UI

v0.82.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.82.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v0.81.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.81.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • #​4842 672920f Thanks @​tim-smart! - allow overriding http span names

    import { FetchHttpClient, HttpClient } from "@​effect/platform"
    import { NodeRuntime } from "@​effect/platform-node"
    import { Effect } from "effect"
    
    Effect.gen(function* () {
      const client = (yield* HttpClient.HttpClient).pipe(
        // Customize the span names for this HttpClient
        HttpClient.withSpanNameGenerator(
          (request) => `http.client ${request.method} ${request.url}`
        )
      )
    
      yield* client.get("https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1")
    }).pipe(Effect.provide(FetchHttpClient.layer), NodeRuntime.runMain)
    

    And for a server:

    import {
      HttpMiddleware,
      HttpRouter,
      HttpServer,
      HttpServerResponse
    } from "@​effect/platform"
    import { NodeHttpServer, NodeRuntime } from "@​effect/platform-node"
    import { Layer } from "effect"
    import { createServer } from "http"
    
    HttpRouter.empty.pipe(
      HttpRouter.get("/", HttpServerResponse.empty()),
      HttpServer.serve(),
      // Customize the span names for this HttpApp
      HttpMiddleware.withSpanNameGenerator((request) => `GET ${request.url}`),
      Layer.provide(NodeHttpServer.layer(createServer, { port: 3000 })),
      Layer.launch,
      NodeRuntime.runMain
    )
    

v0.80.21

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.20

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.19

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.18

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.17

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.16

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.15

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.14

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.13

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.12

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.11

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.80.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v0.79.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.79.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
Effect-TS/effect (@​effect/platform-node)

v0.86.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.86.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.86.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.16

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.15

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.14

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.13

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.12

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.11

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.85.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.84.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.83.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.83.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.83.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.83.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Mar 24 '25 10:03 hash-worker[bot]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 55.20%. Comparing base (a4d8341) to head (02bda88). :warning: Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6770      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.21%   55.20%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1103     1103              
  Lines       98474    98375      -99     
  Branches     4579     4577       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        54375    54307      -68     
+ Misses      43479    43448      -31     
  Partials      620      620              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 4.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
  • :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codecov[bot] avatar Apr 09 '25 22:04 codecov[bot]

[!WARNING] This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite. Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

indietyp avatar Oct 14 '25 11:10 indietyp

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Oct 14 '25 12:10 hash-worker[bot]

Merge activity

  • Oct 15, 8:17 AM UTC: Graphite rebased this pull request, because this pull request is set to merge when ready.

graphite-app[bot] avatar Oct 15 '25 08:10 graphite-app[bot]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002 $$99.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 640 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$5.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001 $$77.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 551 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604 $$294 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.29 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$21.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450 $$232 \mathrm{ms} \pm 853 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308 $$469 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$6.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628 $$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 559 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$25.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-45.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$9.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$53.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$66.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.534 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 428 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$52.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$51.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 769 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.55 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$52.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$46.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$73.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 487 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$580 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

github-actions[bot] avatar Oct 15 '25 09:10 github-actions[bot]