hash icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
hash copied to clipboard

Update npm package `typescript` to v5.8.3

Open hash-worker[bot] opened this issue 10 months ago • 2 comments

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
typescript (source) devDependencies minor 5.7.3 -> 5.8.3
typescript (source) dependencies minor 5.7.3 -> 5.8.3

[!WARNING] Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

microsoft/TypeScript (typescript)

v5.8.3: TypeScript 5.8.3

Compare Source

For release notes, check out the release announcement.

Downloads are available on:

v5.8.2: TypeScript 5.8

Compare Source

For release notes, check out the release announcement.

Downloads are available on:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Mar 02 '25 08:03 hash-worker[bot]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 55.23%. Comparing base (bbbbc76) to head (0faf265). :warning: Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6582      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.13%   55.23%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files        1103     1105       +2     
  Lines       98529    99122     +593     
  Branches     4575     4608      +33     
==========================================
+ Hits        54325    54747     +422     
- Misses      43585    43746     +161     
- Partials      619      629      +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (+4.98%) :arrow_up:
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (-0.65%) :arrow_down:
local.hash-backend-utils 4.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower 66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.93% <ø> (+0.08%) :arrow_up:
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.50% <ø> (-0.09%) :arrow_down:
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 19.66% <ø> (+<0.01%) :arrow_up:
rust.hash-graph-store 31.00% <ø> (-0.66%) :arrow_down:
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 82.07% <ø> (+0.13%) :arrow_up:
rust.hashql-eval 70.23% <ø> (+2.15%) :arrow_up:
rust.hashql-hir 88.42% <ø> (-0.80%) :arrow_down:
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
  • :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codecov[bot] avatar Mar 12 '25 14:03 codecov[bot]

@CiaranMn Tests are passing, but wanted to flag what's new in TypeScript 5.8 before we merge this.

vilkinsons avatar Jul 04 '25 02:07 vilkinsons

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

indietyp avatar Oct 18 '25 15:10 indietyp

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Oct 18 '25 16:10 hash-worker[bot]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002 $$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 729 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$5.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001 $$80.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 593 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604 $$293 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.32 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$22.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450 $$233 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308 $$473 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$7.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-84.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628 $$91.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 551 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.732 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.513 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.705 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$5.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.464 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 616 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$85.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 449 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$93.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$54.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$84.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$58.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.743 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$68.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$71.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.387 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$71.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$52.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$58.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.37 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$53.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$58.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$80.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-58.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$587 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

github-actions[bot] avatar Oct 18 '25 17:10 github-actions[bot]