hash icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
hash copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon hashintel

Update `eslint` npm packages

Open hash-worker[bot] opened this issue 10 months ago • 2 comments

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
eslint (source) devDependencies minor 9.20.1 -> 9.29.0
eslint (source) dependencies minor 9.20.1 -> 9.29.0
eslint-config-prettier dependencies minor 10.0.1 -> 10.1.5
eslint-import-resolver-typescript dependencies minor 3.8.1 -> 3.10.1
eslint-plugin-react-hooks (source) dependencies minor 5.1.0 -> 5.2.0
eslint-plugin-storybook (source) dependencies minor 0.11.3 -> 0.12.0
eslint-plugin-storybook (source) devDependencies minor 0.11.3 -> 0.12.0

[!WARNING] Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.29.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores

v9.28.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores

v9.27.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores

v9.26.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
  • dd98d63 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • c25e858 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • b2397e9 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • addd0a6 docs: fix formatting of unordered lists in Markdown (#​19660) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • a21b38d docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • c0721a7 docs: fix double space in command (#​19657) (CamWass)
Chores

v9.25.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Chores

v9.25.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores

v9.24.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Build Related
  • 366e369 build: re-enable Prettier formatting for package.json files (#​19569) (Francesco Trotta)
Chores

v9.23.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Build Related
  • 2357edd build: exclude autogenerated files from Prettier formatting (#​19548) (Francesco Trotta)
Chores

v9.22.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
  • 86c5f37 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • fbdeff0 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • c9e8510 docs: generate deprecation notice in TSDoc comments from rule metadata (#​19461) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 2f386ad docs: replace var with const in rule examples (#​19469) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 0e688e3 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 06b596d docs: Restore the carrot to the position where the search input was lost (#​19459) (Amaresh S M)
Chores

v9.21.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
  • c5561ea docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 80b0485 docs: replace var with let and const in rule example (#​19434) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • f67d5e8 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 75afc61 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 0636cab docs: Update Eleventy from v2 to v3 (#​19415) (Amaresh S M)
  • dd7d930 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores
prettier/eslint-config-prettier (eslint-config-prettier)

v10.1.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v10.1.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v10.1.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • [#​325]

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

â™» Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Feb 20 '25 00:02 hash-worker[bot]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 55.20%. Comparing base (0e7c6a3) to head (291136d). :warning: Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6493      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.22%   55.20%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1103     1103              
  Lines       98465    98470       +5     
  Branches     4584     4584              
==========================================
- Hits        54373    54365       -8     
- Misses      43472    43485      +13     
  Partials      620      620
Flag Coverage Δ
blockprotocol.type-system 35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 50.93% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 88.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 81.91% <ø> (-0.08%) :arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
  • :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codecov[bot] avatar Feb 20 '25 01:02 codecov[bot]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002 $$97.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$5.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001 $$77.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604 $$290 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450 $$229 \mathrm{ms} \pm 898 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308 $$469 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$6.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-85.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628 $$71.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.87 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.294 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-33.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.88 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$9.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$61.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$70.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$80.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$87.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 391 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$67.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$65.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$54.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$70.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$51.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.725 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$70.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 482 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$22.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 662 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$565 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

github-actions[bot] avatar Oct 14 '25 12:10 github-actions[bot]

Closed in favor of https://github.com/hashintel/hash/pull/6473

vilkinsons avatar Oct 14 '25 15:10 vilkinsons