hash icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
hash copied to clipboard

Update npm package `json-schema-to-typescript` to v15

Open hash-worker[bot] opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
json-schema-to-typescript dependencies major 11.0.5 -> 15.0.2

Release Notes

bcherny/json-schema-to-typescript (json-schema-to-typescript)

v15.0.2

Compare Source

v15.0.1

Compare Source

v15.0.0

Compare Source

  • 62cc052 Fixed bug where intersection schemas didn't generate complete types. Improved output readability for intersection types (#​603)

v14.1.0

Compare Source

v14.0.5

Compare Source

v14.0.4

Compare Source

v14.0.3

Compare Source

v14.0.2

Compare Source

v14.0.1

Compare Source

v14.0.0

Compare Source

v13.1.2

Compare Source

v13.1.1

Compare Source

v13.1.0

Compare Source

  • f797848 Feat: Add support for deprecated keyword

v13.0.1

v13.0.0

  • 05b0103 Bugfix: Parse boolean schemas as schemas, rather than as literals (#​515)
  • 8f973d1 Bugfix: Fix edge case where emitted names were corrupted when using strictIndexSignature (#​423)

v12.0.0

Compare Source

  • b73e1c7 Bugfix: Parse enums as literals, rather than as schemas (#​508)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Sep 10 '24 07:09 hash-worker[bot]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 22.86%. Comparing base (af77cd4) to head (36cdd8a). Report is 44 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5046      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.86%   22.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         573      573              
  Lines       19445    19447       +2     
  Branches     2754     2755       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         4447     4447              
- Misses      14945    14947       +2     
  Partials       53       53              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (-0.01%) :arrow_down:
apps.hash-api 1.16% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

codecov[bot] avatar Nov 02 '24 08:11 codecov[bot]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

hash-worker[bot] avatar Dec 17 '24 13:12 hash-worker[bot]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$87.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.232 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.34 \mathrm{s} \pm 537 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.811 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.70 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.87 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.58 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$3.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.39 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

github-actions[bot] avatar Dec 17 '24 16:12 github-actions[bot]

FYI @CiaranMn Bilal has kindly readied this PR for review.

vilkinsons avatar Dec 18 '24 15:12 vilkinsons