Update Rust crate `libp2p` to 0.54.0

[renovate[bot]]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
libp2p	dependencies	minor	0.53.2 -> 0.54.0

---

Release Notes

libp2p/rust-libp2p (libp2p)

v0.54.0

Compare Source

See individual changelogs for details.

Thanks everyone who contributed to it! :heart:

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[renovate[bot]]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --workspace
error: failed to parse manifest at `/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/Cargo.toml`

Caused by:
  the cargo feature `edition2024` requires a nightly version of Cargo, but this is the `stable` channel
  See https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/appendix-07-nightly-rust.html for more information about Rust release channels.
  See https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/unstable.html#edition-2024 for more information about using this feature.

[vilkinsons]

@indietyp This auto-opened Renovate PR seems to be HaRPC-related, @indietyp, so I'm tagging you in. Hope that's okay. Not an urgent one, though!

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 17.67%. Comparing base (ee4e9e1) to head (c9f35c0). Report is 1591 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4832   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   17.67%   17.67%           
=======================================
  Files         506      506           
  Lines       16566    16566           
  Branches     2546     2546           
=======================================
  Hits         2928     2928           
  Misses      13600    13600           
  Partials       38       38           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.18% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	48.46% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[renovate[bot]]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions[bot]]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$50.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$46.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$89.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$74.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$85.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 839 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-19.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.949 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$73.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 583 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$1.55 \mathrm{s} \pm 4.42 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.45 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.49 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph