kubernetes_manifest: Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest

[bailey84j]

When trying to deploy jetstack module as part of the aws elb module it fails as the api_group is a known after variable

Terraform Version, Provider Version and Kubernetes Version

Terraform v1.0.4
on linux_amd64
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws v3.73.0
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/kubernetes v2.7.1
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/null v3.1.0

Affected Resource(s)

• certificate_kube_system_aws_load_balancer_serving_cert

Terraform Configuration Files

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "certificate_kube_system_aws_load_balancer_serving_cert" {
  manifest = {
    "apiVersion" = "${module.jetstack-certmanager.api_group}/v1"
    "kind"       = "Certificate"
    "metadata" = {
      "labels" = {
        "app.kubernetes.io/name" = var.name
      }
      "name"      = "aws-load-balancer-serving-cert"
      "namespace" = var.namespace
    }
    "spec" = {
      "dnsNames" = [
        "aws-load-balancer-webhook-service.kube-system.svc",
        "aws-load-balancer-webhook-service.kube-system.svc.cluster.local",
      ]
      "issuerRef" = {
        "kind" = "Issuer"
        "name" = "aws-load-balancer-selfsigned-issuer"
      }
      "secretName" = "aws-load-balancer-webhook-tls"
    }
  }


}

Debug Output

GIST

Panic Output

Steps to Reproduce

1. terraform apply -->

Expected Behavior

Kubernetes manifest to know a key variable is known after apply and to skip in plan

Actual Behavior

provider fails

Important Factoids

None

References

None

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

[francardoso93]

Same issue here!

[alexsomesan]

Hi!

I as far as I can tell, the interpolation of ${module.jetstack-certmanager.api_group} in the apiVersion attribute is at fault here. The problem is, if that resource / module isn't already present in state (being created at the same time as this resource) that value isn't yet available at the earlier stages of a plan operation, where it's in fact required by the K8s provider. This results in the value being interpolating as null, the provider trying to locate the "Certificate" resource in the "/v1" resource group, which is where only the cluster built-in resources are.

First question: is the value of module.jetstack-certmanager.api_group really dynamically generated? If not, I would advise to just use plain old text for the apiVersion value.

If yes, you have to split operations into two applies. First apply creates the module.jetstack-certmanager and the second operation creates any resources that need to interpolate values in apiVersion.

Let me know if this advice was helpful.

[dsiguero]

Apparently it also happens when no interpolation is used in the kubernetes_service manifest. I'm getting the same Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest.

env

Terraform v1.0.10
on darwin_amd64
+ provider registry.terraform.io/gavinbunney/kubectl v1.13.1
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/google v3.90.1
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/helm v2.4.1
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/http v2.1.0
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/kubernetes v2.8.0
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/null v3.1.0
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/time v0.7.2

Relevant code:

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "frontend_config" {
  manifest = {
    apiVersion = "networking.gke.io/v1"
    kind = "FrontendConfig"
    metadata = {
      name = "argocd-frontend-config"
      namespace = "argocd"
      generation = 1
    }
    spec = {
      redirectToHttps = {
        enabled = true
      }
    }
  }
}

Output:

╷
│ Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest
│
│   with kubernetes_manifest.frontend_config,
│   on gke-ingress.tf line 35, in resource "kubernetes_manifest" "frontend_config":
│   35: resource "kubernetes_manifest" "frontend_config" {
│
│ cannot select exact GV from REST mapper
╵

[marcofranssen]

Facing similar issues with CRDS.

Our scenario

• install using helm_release crossplane.
• install using kubernetes_manifest the aws crossplane provider
• configure the aws_provider using kubernetes_manifest « this is failing with same error as the CRD apiVersion is not there yet.

Is this something that is resolvable in this module?

[nicraMarcin]

I have the same issue.

$> terraform --version
Terraform v1.0.11
on linux_amd64
+ provider registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/kubernetes v2.10.0

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "customresourcedefinition_kubegres_kubegres_reactive_tech_io" {
  manifest = {
    "apiVersion" = "apiextensions.k8s.io/v1"
    "kind" = "CustomResourceDefinition"
    "metadata" = {
      "annotations" = {
        "controller-gen.kubebuilder.io/version" = "v0.4.1"
      }
      "creationTimestamp" = null
      "name" = "kubegres.kubegres.reactive-tech.io"
    }
    "spec" = {
      "group" = "kubegres.reactive-tech.io"
      "names" = {
        "kind" = "Kubegres"
        "listKind" = "KubegresList"
        "plural" = "kubegres"
        "singular" = "kubegres"
      }
      "scope" = "Namespaced"
      "versions" = [....]
    }
  }
}

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "kubegres_db_postgres_postgres" {
  depends_on = [
    kubernetes_manifest.customresourcedefinition_kubegres_kubegres_reactive_tech_io
  ]
  manifest = {
    "apiVersion" = "kubegres.reactive-tech.io/v1"
    "kind" = "Kubegres"
    "metadata" = {
      "name" = "postgres"
      "namespace" = kubernetes_manifest.namespace_db_postgres.manifest.metadata.name
    }
 # ....
 }
}

and this generates error:

$> terraform plan
╷
│ Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest
│ 
│   with kubernetes_manifest.kubegres_db_postgres_postgres,
│   on postgres-cluster.tf line 33, in resource "kubernetes_manifest" "kubegres_db_postgres_postgres":
│   33: resource "kubernetes_manifest" "kubegres_db_postgres_postgres" {
│ 
│ no matches for kind "Kubegres" in group "kubegres.reactive-tech.io"
╵

but when I remove/comment resource "kubernetes_manifest" "kubegres_db_postgres_postgres" resource and apply customresourcedefinition first, then add again kubegres_db_postgres_postgres it works.

[marcofranssen]

Similarly on a terraform destroy this resource still first tries to do all kind of checks. When the resource for some reason doesn't exist, the terraform destroy will fail.

[yaroslav-nakonechnikov]

i feel same pain...

my setup. 2 repos:

• first is preparing eks and installing CRDs on eks
• second is installing resources based on CRDs

and now i see issue: "Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest" when do terraform destroy or terraform refresh on second repo.

[ibadullaev-inc4]

Same issue.

1. Use helm_release to install CRDs
2. install kubernetes_manifest using that CRDs

Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest
with kubernetes_manifest.


no matches for kind "xxxx" in group "XXXXXXX"

[pessoa]

Also experiencing the same here.

[koalalorenzo]

Having the same issue, It would be easier to deploy all at once by just "allowing to skip" CRD validation! If we could get an option in the terraform resource to skip API validation for CRD that are not yet there, it would work like a charm!

[quantumsheep]

Same issue with the following configuration :

resource "helm_release" "rabbit_cluster_operator" {
  name = "rabbitmq-cluster-operator"

  repository = "https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami"
  chart      = "rabbitmq-cluster-operator"
}

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "documents_rabbitmq_operator" {
  depends_on = [helm_release.rabbit_cluster_operator]

  manifest = {
    "apiVersion" = "rabbitmq.com/v1beta1"
    "kind"       = "RabbitmqCluster"
    "metadata" = {
      "name"      = "rabbit"
      "namespace" = "default"
    }
  }
}

It could be great to add an option to the existing wait argument to wait for a named api before running creation.

[Tadcas]

The same issue with argocd app of apps (argoproj.io apiVersion):

resource "helm_release" "argocd" { name = "argocd" repository = "https://argoproj.github.io/argo-helm" chart = "argo-cd" version = "5.13.2" create_namespace = "true" namespace = "argocd" lint = true }

resource "kubernetes_secret" "argocd_secret" { depends_on = [helm_release.argocd] metadata { labels = { "argocd.argoproj.io/secret-type" = "repository" } name = "argocd-deployment-secret" namespace = "argocd" } data = { password = "${var.argo_cd}" url = "https://gitlab.com/my-group/deployment.git" username = "argocd" } }

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "argocd_application" { depends_on = [kubernetes_secret.argocd_secret] manifest = { apiVersion = "argoproj.io/v1alpha1" kind = "Application" metadata = { name = "argocd-sync" namespace = "argocd" } spec = { destination = { namespace = "argocd" server = "https://kubernetes.default.svc" } project = "default" source = { path = "argocd/overlays/${var.environment_name}" repoURL = "https://gitlab.com/my-group/deployment.git" targetRevision = "HEAD" } syncPolicy = { automated = {} } } } }

│ Error: Failed to determine GroupVersionResource for manifest │ │ with kubernetes_manifest.argocd_application, │ on main.tf line 329, in resource "kubernetes_manifest" "argocd_application": │ 329: resource "kubernetes_manifest" "argocd_application" { │ │ no matches for kind "Application" in group "argoproj.io"

If resource "kubernetes_manifest" "argocd_application" is commented and I run terraform plan / apply, everything is working. Only after that I am able to terraform plan / apply resource "kubernetes_manifest" "argocd_application". If trying to plan everything at he same time, getting provided error.

[a0s]

So, no way to disable checking of crd existing at planning phase ?

[framctr]

Same issue as #1367 . Please add a 👍🏻 to that issue to prioritize the request.

[ju4nmg]

abandonned issue?

[gianarb]

Same issue here

[noamgreen]

Same issue here

try to wait { condition { type = "ContainersReady" status = "True" }

not working

[javierguzman]

So does anyone have a workaround for this issue? Thank you in advance and regards

[aiell0]

Would love a workaround here as I just hit this as well :(

[Bharath509]

I'm also facing the same issue.

[polanjir]

Hi all, I encountered a similar problem with ClusterIssuers CRDs of Cert-manager and fixed it with HELM provider because it doesn't evaluate CRD with KubeAPI as kubernetes_manifest terraform resource. Here is my example

resource "helm_release" "cert_manager" {
  name              = "cert-manager"
  repository        = "https://charts.jetstack.io"
  chart             = "cert-manager"
  namespace         = var.cert_manager_namespace
  create_namespace  = true
  version           = var.cert_manager_release
  dependency_update = true
  values = [
    yamlencode({
      installCRDs              = true
      replicaCount             = 2
    })
  ]
}

resource "kubernetes_secret" "k8s_secret" {
  depends_on = [helm_release.cert_manager]
  for_each   = { for secret in var.secretsmanager_secrets : secret.k8s_secret_name => secret }
  metadata {
    name      = each.key
    namespace = var.cert_manager_namespace
  }
  data = {
    (each.value.secret_key) = jsondecode(data.aws_secretsmanager_secret_version.current[each.value.name].secret_string)[each.value.secret_key]
  }
}

resource "helm_release" "cluster_issuers" {
  depends_on = [helm_release.cert_manager, kubernetes_secret.k8s_secret]
  name       = "cluster-issuers"
  repository = "https://bedag.github.io/helm-charts/"
  chart      = "raw"
  version    = "2.0.0"
  namespace  = var.cert_manager_namespace

  values = [
    yamlencode({
      resources = var.cert_manager_manifests_cluster_issuers
    })
  ]
}

[meysam81]

:white_check_mark:

In case anyone gets here and haven't yet figured it out... I was facing the same issue as everyone else in this thread...

The way I solved this was to convert my YAML-encoded string into TF syntax, allowing for the dynamic values to enforce a dependency between resources and forcing the child resource to wait for the parent.

Here's the concrete example for further understanding.

I converted this resource:

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "this" {
  manifest = yamldecode(<<-EOF
  apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1
  kind: ExternalSecret
  metadata:
    name: pgpassword
    namespace: default
  spec:
    data:
      - remoteRef:
          key: ${azurerm_key_vault_secret.this.name} # <- it fails because of this not being static value
        secretKey: PGPASSWORD
    refreshInterval: 1h
    secretStoreRef:
      kind: ClusterSecretStore
      name: azure-keyvault
    EOF
  )
}

To this one:

resource "kubernetes_manifest" "this" {
  manifest = {
    apiVersion = "external-secrets.io/v1beta1"
    kind       = "ExternalSecret"
    metadata = {
      name      = "pgpassword"
      namespace = "default"
    }
    spec = {
      data = [
        {
          remoteRef = {
            key = azurerm_key_vault_secret.this.name # but this succeeds cause this is expected TF syntax
          }
          secretKey = "PGPASSWORD"
        }
      ]
      refreshInterval = "1h"
      secretStoreRef = {
        kind = "ClusterSecretStore"
        name = "azure-keyvault"
      }
    }
  }
}

And this solved it for me. :rocket: