terraform-provider-aws
terraform-provider-aws copied to clipboard
datasource: add aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration (#26054)
Description
This Merge Request adds a datasource for aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration resource.
Relations
Closes #26054 Closes #27369
References
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_GetBucketEncryption.html#AmazonS3-GetBucketEncryption-response-ServerSideEncryptionConfiguration
Output from Acceptance Testing
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/s3/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_' -timeout 180m
=== RUN TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_aes256
=== PAUSE TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_aes256
=== RUN TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_kms
=== PAUSE TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_kms
=== RUN TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_default_encryption
=== PAUSE TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_default_encryption
=== CONT TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_aes256
=== CONT TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_default_encryption
=== CONT TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_kms
--- PASS: TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_default_encryption (42.72s)
--- PASS: TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_kms (44.30s)
--- PASS: TestAccS3BucketServerSideEncryptionConfigurationDataSource_aes256 (44.65s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/s3 44.770s
Community Note
Voting for Prioritization
- Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
- Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
- Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
For Submitters
- Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
- For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
- Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.
All issues detected by CI fixed. PR ready for review 👍🏼
Really wanting this. Can we get it pushed out?