Hari

Can anyone help me how do I stop etcd/bbolt panicking from given cifs + cache=none option?

I will try this in 3.5.4 too I spent some time and kind of getting some direction. When we have the cache=none, it looks like the page cache wont reflect...

I tried to see if refreshing the first two pages (length = 2*4KB in my case) can help in tx.init(). It throws invalid arg. Everything looks good. Any other way...

Can someone help me in with this below understanding? - User calls etcdctl put key value - etcd server first writes to WAL - then get consensus through RAFT -...

Thank you @ahrtr for sharing. I think that confirms. I am planning to close the issue because WAL cover up the main reason (data loss) and trying to disable the...

@ahrtr I dont see any difference in call stack. Atleast with the CIFS (cache=strict) I tried, I dont see any error related to sync. 

Just FYI https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216301

@ahrtr do you think we can document before closing this defect? I dont know if etcd or boltdb can cover up this issue.

May I know if I can pick up this and try providing a fix?

Thanks @tiagolobocastro. Let me try and see if I can get a PR by next week. Hope that works.