hartmannathan

@a-lunev what are you trying to achieve? Is this similar to the BDMA/SRAM4 heap clobbering issue fixed in [4716fc929d7](https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/commit/4716fc929d74850283120507e84913838e722904) / [PR-3198](https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3198)?

How would you envision treating MCUs that have multiple "banks" of SRAM? (I don't know if "bank" is the correct term.) For example, a chip I use, STM32G474x, has: -...

> Hi @hartmannathan, > I am sorry that there is no progress on this, but I have limited free time lately. Hello, @fjpanag , no worries. Thanks for your reply

For anyone following along, a related discussion occurred in the `dev@` mailing list thread "How to ensure HEAP will not overlap static DMA buffer?" started on 2021/03/25 and archived here:...

> In this initial change I start replacing `inline` with `inline_function` (that is currently a force inline actually) so now I'm thinking of: > > 1. Rework `inline_function` to be...

> The plan is _not_ to use cargo and automatically download missing crates, as this is not - at least for my understanding - the right path for an embedded...

> @hartmannathan do you have any test results? I am about to test this now.

> @hartmannathan do you have any test results? I'm not sure what happened here: ``` 5126 git checkout master --force 5127 git pull 5128 wget https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/6318.patch 5129 git apply 6318.patch...

> #7159 here is PR with rename Doh! Thank you! I will test that right now...

Oh, I misunderstood... #7159 is the PR that renamed stuff, not your re-based PR. Okay, I will wait for the new PR. Ping me when it's ready!