Results from JS API

[kevinsawicki]

If you are calling replace as a function it would be cool to get information back about what was replaced as it runs or after it completes.

Perhaps return a results object or take an options callback that reports back file and occurrence information as it runs.

[harthur]

+1

[gastonelhordoy]

+1 For this to be feasible, the function should receive a callback as second parameter. This would not only make the function properly asynchronous (stick to standards), but would allow to:

• send errors back instead of throwing them which is dangerous in an async environment (no try/catch mechanism from the calling function).
• send the response back under an asynchrounous scenario.

[jaumard]

+1