Miloš Prchlík
Miloš Prchlík
> Attempt2. This time I've separated the usage into `tmt.container` and vanilla `dataclaess.dataclass`. One that is rather ambiguous is `tmt.queue.Task`, wondering if that should also be covered, maybe by a...
> @happz please find out what to do with this if we can make it in the release Most likely not, despite the `priority | must`. I'm working on the...
> > Attempt2. This time I've separated the usage into `tmt.container` and vanilla `dataclaess.dataclass`. One that is rather ambiguous is `tmt.queue.Task`, wondering if that should also be covered, maybe by...
> I think for now to get the first part of splitting the `container` logic to its own package, should be ok. We can workshop the requirements more in the...
/packit build
/packit build
/packit build
> > > Are we sure about the name `container`? I don't have a better one myself, just raising it as I imagine it could clash with lxc nomenclature. >...
Adding `blocked`, to get https://github.com/teemtee/tmt/pull/3519 merged first as it simplifies some pieces of configuration handling.
BTW the PR deserves a better subject and message.