Henry Andrews

@zohairhadi it's proposed for 3.2. We're currently busy getting 3.0.4 and 3.1.1 out the door. 3.2 is next - there's no planned schedule but I'm hopeful we can ship it...

PRs merged for 3.0.4 and ported to 3.1.1 via PR #3921!

@OAI/tsc review request: Is there anything we want to do here? We have a registry site, it's on gh-pages. We have an issue tracking moving that to a directory rather...

@darrelmiller @webron @philsturgeon this is related to #2092 and therefore also #2099.

@pleothaud in the JSON Schema project we allow many practices that seem "bad" at first glance because they become interesting in large and complex projects, or in use cases that...

@pleothaud I'm not the right person to ask for an authoritative answer for OAS- that would be @darrelmiller or @webron. For OAS 3.0, where the Schema Object does **not** support...

@darrelmiller I don't think that we can change this prior to Moonwalk because restricting `$ref` targets in 3.2 would invalidate OADs that are valid under 3.1. PR #3732 is the...

@MikeRalphson Operation IDs are primarily for use in Link Objects, right?

Previous comment says we can close, so closing :-)

Fixed by #3823 and #3906