Håkon Wiik Ånes
Håkon Wiik Ånes
The format in the file I have access to is: ``` ├── Data │ ├── Master │ │ ├── Dynamical │ │ │ ├── Lower (1001, 1001), uint16 │ │...
Thank you for giving some insight into the format, @CiosG. Just what I hoped for! If you could provide me with another test file or two with complete symmetry information...
Ah, I see. But would the atoms be returned if you defined the phase yourself? Because that is possible, I assume. No, I don't have access to it anymore. Please...
But you shouldn't get nice hexagonal symmetry in your pattern with just the identity operation, though? I'm puzzled by that. I'll ask my colleague who I got the data from.
Thanks a lot for the master patterns, @CiosG. The reader in https://github.com/pyxem/kikuchipy/pull/706 could read them without issue.
Thanks, I'll look for the offending test and try to prevent the bug (most likely from incorrect use of Numba).
@Tijmenvermeij, do you have a *.uebsp file to share?
Or rather, @CiosG, do you have one?
If you're feeling adventurous and want to try out the `develop` branch you could try rotating your orientations with `Rotation.from_align_vectors([1, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0])` ([docs](https://orix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/generated/orix.quaternion.Quaternion.from_align_vectors.html#orix.quaternion.Quaternion.from_align_vectors)). Would that be enough?...
Do you want to combine the maps into one array/plot? Or save images of different IPF maps but with the same shape? One way to do the former is shown...