Tim Haines

What version of Dyninst are you using? What build configuration did you use? >Changing BPatch_snippet.C:1510 into Those are the current defaults (see [BPatch_image.h:185](https://github.com/dyninst/dyninst/blob/master/dyninstAPI/h/BPatch_image.h#L181)).

@mxz297 Looking through the code for `dyn_pthread_self`, I don't see any reason it should be marked as uninstrumentable. There is a version in the RT, but it has the standard...

@mxz297 Should we implement the suggested fix, or should we wait until the misdetection of the indirect tail call is fixed?

@woodard I couldn't find any mention of an implementation of this in gcc/ld. Do you know if it's there yet?

@woodard Are your current builds/tests failing because these instructions are missing? @sashanicolas Do you have any thoughts on how much work this would be to implement? @mxz297 It looks like...

@mxz297 Should we just manually add these SVE registers for now?

Whoa. I'm curious if we need to upgrade to a newer version of the ROSE source. In either case, let's not work on that right now...

I'm not able to reproduce. I've tried with Ubuntu 20.04 on both x86_64 and aarch64. Could you re-run your example mutator with `DYNINST_DEBUG_PARSE=1` set in the environment and post the...

Bah! I don't know how I didn't see the `argv[0]` in the example. Thanks for the updated test! I can now confirm this crashes when running Dyninst built on Ubuntu...

This was removed by https://github.com/boostorg/build/commit/eb8da52df3a43ca9616a7a6e11e0ad6fe896c031. I have contacted the author, and am awaiting a response. I will post back here once I have an update.