Haikal Ryclova-Pribadi

I think you mean `for all`, right? > _"If, for all `requirements` of group `prereq`, a user is related to the `requirement`, then the user is is contained in group...

We do have a syntax highlighter grammar for Sublime, and several other IDEs by the community, @vmax. We're planning to aggregate them into the `graknlabs/graql` repo once we split Graql...

What @flyingsilverfin suggested above is the official alternative/workaround, actually. I get that it's not entirely identical, as the attributes need to be collected from all entries in the map, as...

Thanks for the feature request, @shasha79 ! I think the final syntax for the feature will look like something along the lines of: ``` match $x id [V168040, V118888]; get...

We can implement this, as follows: ``` request sub relation @abstract, relates subject @abstract, relates requester, relates respondent; ``` This pattern only makes sense for relation and role types, as...

You mean cardinality constraints or simply having more than 1 cardinality for each role, @iddan ? The latter is natively possible in Graql.

But why? I'm not sure I understand why you need to store an escaped quote? A string with a quote is not wrong. You can easily write that like this,...

What does "edge ordering" mean, @lveillard ? The only thing that could be sorted are things with data value, i.e. attributes.

Since we have a new issue, I'll close this one as "duplicate", and we track the new one.

@pb376 your expectations of what TypeDB can do based on what's advertised on the website is accurate. However I think you are using the wrong TypeQL query. `match` is a...