Hadley Wickham
Hadley Wickham
I think it would be posisble, although it might be tricky to do it as performantly as with `map()` since there the progress bar (and the iteration) is implemented in...
IMO we need to stick with the current print method or its going to be too foreign for existing dplyr users. OTOH we might want to consider an explicit "lazy"...
Yes, this is definitely a bug and it's one of the things that annoys me most about `expand.grid()`!
``` r x Warning: 1 parsing failure. #> row col expected actual #> 1 -- time like %H:%M:%OS 1:2:3.057 #> NA strptime(x, format = "%H:%M:%OS") #> [1] "2023-07-31 01:02:03 CDT"...
This reprex is sufficient to illustrate the problem, right? ``` r library(tidyverse) df # A tibble: 2 × 2 #> a b #> #> 1 1 #> 2 2 df...
Yeah, this looks like it'll be hard to fix — `discard_at()` is fundamentally design to work with vectors, not higher-dimensional structures. I'd suggest taking a different approach.
If it's not clear what you're doing, please make a PR to the README that describes it.
Could/should we just make an empty test name an error unconditionally? (or maybe make it a warning and then upgrade it to an error in a couple of years)
Hmmm yeah, mostly used for testing though. I think we could fix those.
It's weird that it's the only `local_` function that lives in rlang, and I just hit a package (evaluate) where it'd be nice to use it (it doesn't have an...