Hadley Wickham
Hadley Wickham
Possibly should be informed by https://hackers.town/@zwol/114155595855705796
``` r library(readr) df x #> 1 1970-01-01 #> 2 Inf output x #> 1970-01-01 #> Inf read_csv(output, col_types = list()) #> # A tibble: 2 × 1 #> x...
I think it would be ideal if we could just make this a shortcut for calling `pkgdown::build_site()` in the console.
Yes, there definitely should be a new line there, yielding: ```R list( c( a ), c( b ) ) ``` (and this is what codegrip generates) I agree that this...
So I think this is covered by the style guide (or at least is sufficiently esoteric we don't need to explicit mention it)
Rerpex: ``` r library(conflicted) library(R.utils) #> Loading required package: R.oo #> Loading required package: R.methodsS3 #> R.methodsS3 v1.8.2 (2022-06-13 22:00:14 UTC) successfully loaded. See ?R.methodsS3 for help. #> R.oo v1.26.0...
Looks like this is an R.utils buglet: ``` r library(R.utils) #> Loading required package: R.oo #> Loading required package: R.methodsS3 #> R.methodsS3 v1.8.2 (2022-06-13 22:00:14 UTC) successfully loaded. See ?R.methodsS3...
Somewhat more minimal reprex: ``` r library(tidyverse) df [1] "a" "b" "c" df |> separate_wider_delim(x, delim = "-", names = c("a", "b")) |> rownames() #> [1] "1" "2" "3" ```...
Could you please rework your reproducible example to use the [reprex package](http://reprex.tidyverse.org) ? That makes it easier to see both the input and the output, formatted in such a way...
I can't replicate it: ``` r library(readr) lines