hab25

> What would using mistty instead of eat for eshell mode bring, in terms of features? It would allow one to have Emacs editing features, as well as the [`mistty`...

> I haven't used eshell much, but it seems that it would, like mistty, already give you access to all Emacs and shell editing tools, since eshell is written in...

> We cant remove this check. It prevents errors for users without `ollama` installed. I see. If that is its only purpose, then, instead of `#'file-exists-p`, `#'executable-find` can be used...

> If I didn't have to support this ollama special case, I would be able to save on some special-case code. (another, more important reason, is that I think the...

> If I add it, it will be optional. You could make it optional, and required only for the markdown-to-org conversion. This would still allow you to remove the ellama...

> I suppose you can just teach nix-index to use those caches to enrich the database. Does "you" refer to the user or to `nix-index` contributors?

This would be useful for the user to better identify which session they will be chatting with, especially in cases where they are concurrently participating in multiple ellama chats.

A very disruptive workaround that should be granular enough is for one to structure their code such that the "certain lines or sexps" are located in another file which will...

see also https://github.com/eshelyaron/kubed/discussions/3

> I'm a bit wary of enabling automatic reformatting Despite the name, `elisp-autofmt` provides commands to be used non-automatically, and used in this way it still has the significant advantage...