Haad
Haad
Thanks @shanexavier313 for the question! The project hasn't been updated in a long time and is definitely out of date. As far as I know, updating the deps and making...
This was done in #363
Thanks @ohager for opening the issue! π I don't think the replication updates are hooked up to the UI. That is, even if your peers are syncing / have synced...
Sounds good. Btw. the event on local peer (writer) is `write`, and `replicated` on the remote peer (the one replicating). See if that triggers correctly.
I like the idea of having more customizable indexing in stores via validation functions. The problem of doing it on the index/store level is that the oplog (which is the...
What kind of validation *would be* possible if ACs had access to their store? Is there a way, for example, to create logic that βdelaysβ returning invalid (false) until it...
> If an AC had access to their store, they could perform just such validation as I described Do you mean that this (access to the store) would solve your...
@CSDUMMI would it be possible for you to make such functionality by implementing a custom Store/Index (as opposed to trying to *right now* generalize it into KVStore)?
As side note, eventual consistency doesn't lend itself well for the use case described above, which is "making sure there's only one unique value for a key in database". This...
Amazing @vasa-develop! π Thank you for the PR π The code looks good to me, but would love second pair of eyes on it to confirm. What we should have...