Gyula Fora
Gyula Fora
Still an example so we should probably not make this change and simply close it
We can update beam dependency in the future instead
Closing this in favor of updating the beam dependency later. Please re-open when necessary :)
@Anshul1128 are you still working on this?
I am closing this PR due to inactivity, please re-open if you pick it up again
What's the status of this? Could you guys @SamBarker @k-wall sort out the issues that you have found? Does this mean that the changes we released in 1.10.0 don't really...
@SamBarker if you would like to backport it for a potential bug fix release, then please open a separate PR for `release-1.10` please :)
Thanks @gaborgsomogyi , overall looks good. Please add 1-2 comments to the critical parts that you also explain in the PR.
Just to add my 2 cents here, I think not releasing TMs after downscaling the running job with the adaptive scheduler is definitely more like a bug then a feature....
Hey @ctrlaltdilj ! Are you still working on this PR?