Gus
Gus
Have you seen the new proposal of adding a `string` computation expression? Looks like it will cover this.
I propose let's put in hold for now, for the above reasons plus it looks to me like that proposal it's gonna be approved. If it's declined we can add...
Just to add more information, `pure` is unfortunately a reserved word in F#, `retn` is an abbreviation and abbreviations are not encouraged in the F# guidelines. I think we could...
I would rather say: > you would have to write: a |> b |> c |> (op) Any suggestions for either operator or abbreviation?
Yes, looks like it can be added to the ``Collection`` abstraction which represents everything that is List-like but doesn't fit well in the ``Monoid`` or ``Foldable`` which are the preferred...
This might be relevant: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11437269/haskell-append-type-class
What would be such generic operator or method name?
So you mean to add the generic `insert` function?
To me `insert` sounds more like insert something somewhere in the middle. It's not clearer than `cons` and `snoc` which tells exactly where the insertion is going to happen.
Note that the name of the abstraction is only relevant for our docs as they are not reflected in the code, more than maybe a filename.