Masataro Asai

good suggestion. My wish was, though, to make this library part of the standard. I don't know how that's possible and I don't think it will ever happen actually.

> we can try to write some good enough APIs and documentation and tests and examples to try and make it a de-facto standard hmmm.... I do not recommend it,...

So if I ever seriously consider something about a new standard etc., it will be when I work on such a language, rather than on working on CL community directly.

> I think that a decent and working and documented CL interface is something that can be eventually ported to a CL successor of some sort, whenever it happens. agreed...

Indeed. I once looked into both CCL and SBCL code. I ran out of time, but I will be back, I hope.

it is just a matter of manpower.

I wish if anyone can edit my own comment that includes the checkbox, but thats not what github permits.

hmmm... I was not a big fan of multiplot but @mmaul added the feature anyways. I never used the feature myself. Not a fan because: * the semantics in gnuplot...

thanks for the info, TIL. The complicated implementation in the current %plot function is related to the gnuplot script requirement of how the inline data for the plot should be...

fix commited