Possible feature request: offical helm chart
I found this chart but it seems quite rudimentary as a Helm chart.
I’m missing the following features:
- ExternalSecrets support
- OIDC -> secrets integration
- Configuration via ConfigMap
- tmp volume for rootless operation
- Database volume
- Automatically include additional volumes in the configuration
- Onlyoffice deployed next to it, optinal deployment of onlyoffice
These are currently my desired features. I can contribute to development, but I’m not sure yet if there is an official Helm chart. Currently, I’m working on a proof of concept for the ConfigMap.
If there isn’t one, the question is: should it be included in this repo, or should a separate repo be created for it?
The easiest path is to open a show and tell discussion.
You could also contribute to the official docs repo with a new user guide for this.
It would be a great addition
Thanks for the response.
Nearly done, just in the test phase if everything works as expected, since I am new to "filebrowser-quantum" the configs are a little confusing.
For now are missing:
- documentation
- onlyoffice
- externalsecrets -> nothing in the way from what I can see that it will work
- oidc -> this I will do next since I need it asap
If I understood you correctly, I will close this issue and create a new one for the documentation. Or is it possible to move this issue to the documentation?
Chart repo – https://github.com/chriaack/filebrowser‑quantum‑chart
What’s already in place
- Core installation of FileBrowser via Helm
- Minimal configuration through values.yaml
Missing features / next steps
- helm-release wrapper – a reusable release template so the chart can be deployed from CI/CD (e.g., GitHub Actions) without manual helm commands.
- OnlyOffice sub‑chart – integration for collaborative document editing, which is currently not bundled.
- Frontend configuration via Helm values – expose UI options (theme, language, etc.) directly through the chart’s values.yaml.
Once the release workflow is solidified I’ll add detailed documentation and look into deploying a self‑hosted runner using GitHub Runner docs.
Let me know if you’d like any of these features prioritized or have other suggestions.