Jonathan Grynspan

https://grynspan.me

@apple Toronto, Canada Might know what he's doing. (Says as much on his business cards.) Any ol’ pronouns will do. 🦻🏻

Results 522 comments of


                                            Jonathan Grynspan

Allow using 'withKnownIssue' as a test or suite trait

It is not possible to infer type information for a trait's arguments/etc. based on the type of the function to which the `@Test` attribute is applied. Hence, it is not...

Allow using 'withKnownIssue' as a test or suite trait

> The same stands for the `@Test` macros themselves, but that didn’t stop us from having them accept unconstrained collections. Or am I missing the point? That's a fair question....

Add a test for property access on ~Escapable types

I believe this test is dependent on #840, right?

Add a test for property access on ~Escapable types

Nope, just confirming the dependency is why the test failed. You could redirect the PR to merge to that branch, and then it would pass?

Add a test for property access on ~Escapable types

@swift-ci test

[WIP] Serialization traits for data dependencies

@swift-ci test

[WIP] Serialization traits for data dependencies

@swift-ci test

[WIP] Serialization traits for data dependencies

@swift-ci test

[WIP] Serialization traits for data dependencies

@swift-ci test

[WIP] Serialization traits for data dependencies

@swift-ci test

‹
1
2
...
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
...
52
53
›