Use window.callPhantom?

[jzaefferer]

PhantomJS 1.6+ has a callback API that might be useful to replace the alert-json-tmp-file hackity hack. QUnit's phantomjs now makes use of that, maybe that's useful as a reference: https://github.com/jquery/qunit/blob/0552f0d8ae1a43fcfa0bbee17dc958fef2d29e0d/addons/phantomjs/runner.js#L115

[JamesMGreene]

Here's the API reference on it, too, freshly updated: https://github.com/ariya/phantomjs/wiki/API-Reference#wiki-webpage-onCallback

[cowboy]

This seems like a good idea but I currently lack the bandwidth to do anything with it. If you submit a working PR, however, I'll definitely merge it in!

Also, unit tests?

[JamesMGreene]

Also, unit tests?

Do you mean you would want additional unit tests in the grunt-lib-phantomjs plugin for this, or you want to see the related PhantomJS unit tests?

[cowboy]

I was just saying this project could probably use unit tests in general. But I don't know what they should look like. Maybe it's less unit and more functional. Either way, something that asserts that things are working as-intended!

[maenu]

I second that.

It took me hours to figure out how to communicate between PhantomJS and grunt, by alert() or console.log(), without changing the module that uses PhantomJS. But together with grunt-istanbul and grunt-contrib-jasmine, I have now a branch coverage report for my jasmine tests - awesome.

[jsoverson]

@maenu, I'd love to see how you set up coverage reporting with grunt-istanbul and contrib-jasmine

[maenu]

I made an example repo under example-grunt-jasmine-istanbul.

[Arkni]

From PhantomJS docs:

window.callPhantom is still an experimental API. In the near future, it will be likely replaced with a message-based solution which will still provide the same functionality

Is this issue still relevant ?

[jzaefferer]

Sounds useful to keep this open until that new API is available.