Taha Aziz Ben Ali

If you don't mind getting your hands dirty, I would suggest hacking up a special implementation of `libmacchina::shared::cpu_cores()` for the `macos` module, but the best course of action would be...

Hi. It can't. I don't really know how to tackle this problem, either. I also don't have the hardware to try and write an implementation. It would be very appreciated...

> Even if multiple batteries are present, shouldn't macchina just report the status of the first one? Yes, indeed. I'll see what I can do to fix this. Adding support...

@Gobidev Could this be related to https://github.com/Macchina-CLI/libmacchina/issues/154?

Thanks for the confirmation. I'm not particularly motivated to work on an implementation for the `ndb` database, because (1) I'd probably write something that's even slower than spawning the corresponding...

Thanks for making that change! It's just unfortunate that this package seems to be in a sort of deserted state.

@uttarayan21 mentioned in our chat in the (lib)macchina matrix room, that we continue to package libmacchina with all features enabled by default (if we were to implement this proposed change)....

Here are some of the new readouts I propose: ```rust pub trait GraphicalReadout { /// This function should return the name of the used desktop environment. /// /// _e.g._ `Plasma`...

The linked pull request was written purely as a demonstration. It's only working on Linux right now, since it makes some pretty bold breaking changes to the API (that would...

I think it's important that you brought this up, I have always wondered how many milliseconds we can shave off just by saving a state instead of reinstantiating the necessary...