Christoph Groth

Thanks for the pointers. (Looking forward to your response!) Here is just some more context for what I wrote above: I tried to use `gptel-split-buffer-directive` [that you suggested in another...

> > ...but in interactive usage I haven’t found a way to change the system message which is always the default one. It seems like I would have to provide...

> > No, I mean that I can activate my split directive, and it works, but then I’m not able to vary the system message, because choosing the system message...

Returning to the topic of exploring alternative mechanisms for static directives, let me try to summarize my points - I fear that they got a bit mixed up in the...

> @grothesque Thanks for putting your thoughts together into a single post, that makes it easier to follow. I'm currently busy addressing bugs and issues opened in the past week,...

Hello, if someone is willing to discuss the ideas presented here, I am still interested. (There has been some evolution as the issue progressed, but https://github.com/karthink/gptel/issues/546#issuecomment-2578863860 is a complete write...

@karthink, thanks for the confirmation. My message was primarily meant at others who might be interested. (And by the way, I am impressed by your productivity.)

Having used gptel for 9 months now, I mainly find the chat interface (with context) useful. Being able to easily edit parts of the conversation (including the replies), as well...

I did some experimenting. The function `mult_py` of the example can be indeed rewritten in a safe way as follows: ```rust #[pyfn(m)] fn mult_safe) { let x = x.as_array_mut(); mult(a,...

I think I finally understand now, but this took me many hours of studying https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3/pull/2885 and the like. Would a patch that introduces some hints into the documentation (notably the...