Map - Additional questions/problems to address and consider.

[vavalos5]

After a call with Matthew from the GLCP team, he brought up the following questions. I wanted to ensure to document them so we can address them.

Why are we not wanting to implement clusters and markers within the same view? How does that look like when there's multiple large clusters and smaller clusters that can be markers within the view?

Are there any limitations or guidance on how many clusters and markers you can have in a section? I did mention that this will be driven by the API once we decide on a map, however, I was informed by Kurt that we may want to limit this after conversations with Scott.

Can the toolbar be placed above the map so when you switch between the map and the datatable, the experience doesn't drastically change or shift.

What does the tip look like when you want to view all of the details within a cluster in DataTable form? There was an example Matthew showed where the tip had a "details" anchor link. I mentioned how inserting links within a tip is not accessible. I also mentioned how it would be best to make the marker or the cluster clickable to get into that detail or datatable view.

In addition to the question above, he asked whether we've explore how the details of the cluster or marker will look like. Will we have a list to the left of the map where it shows the cluster details or what that experience is going to look like.

While we're currently not supporting clickable cards as filters like within the map, Matthew was asking whether the KPIs would be reflected above depending on the data the user is viewing.