Potential removal of N/A as a clinical significance for Predictive evidence types

[jsaliba10]

21 Predictive EIDs (11 approved) are currently in CIViC that have N/A listed as their clinical significance. Upon a brief review, some of these should be reclassified as other evidence types and others should have their clinical significance modified with a potential change in evidence direction.

Should N/A be removed as an option for this field?