Jung-Sang Ahn

@Steamgjk The numbers on the benchmark result page are just for reference, and of course, the performance will vary according to the environment. And note that the workload generated by...

Hi @alesapin NuRaft itself doesn't call `save_logical_snp_obj` and `create_snapshot` at the same time. `save_logical_snp_obj` will be invoked in snapshot transmission mode only, while `create_snapshot` will be called in normal mode...

Ah, now I get your point. It will be somewhat tricky to handle the situation if `create_snapshot` takes a long time (or even stuck forever) and meanwhile, things changed so...

Fix: https://github.com/eBay/NuRaft/pull/33

Hi @faithware This doesn't seem normal. Can you share the log file of both servers?

@faithware If you meant restarting it without killing the process, please refer to this test code to shut it down and then restart it: https://github.com/eBay/NuRaft/blob/789cc75869a6914d4c13aab6c2d5b48dba198f68/tests/unit/asio_service_test.cxx#L2297-L2298 Call `raft_server::shutdown()`, and then close...

@faithware You don't have to, but just to be safe. :)

Thanks for your suggestion. Actually we plan to make the implementation of `buffer` pluggable, as adding a few bytes of meta in front of user data is disruptive (for those...

@sheepgrass Currently, we don't have ETA as it is supposed to be a significant overhaul of the code. `memcpy` issue exists only when your system uses its own buffer structure...

> 'hack' my own buffer to have structure same as the provided `buffer`. Yes, this is the same way as what we are doing internally here. Maybe we can provide...